Transfusion of packed red blood cells in adults with sickle cell anemia treated at an emergency hospital

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the prescription of packed red blood cells performed by emergency physicians for adults with sickle cell anemia. METHODS: Transfusions performed in adults with sickle cell anemia treated at an emergency service in São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo Brazil, between January 2018 and January 2022 were evaluated. For data comparison, the chi-square2 test was used. The significance level adopted was 5%. RESULTS: A total of 114 transfusions were performed. The mean age was 41.8±16.4 years, and pretransfusion hemoglobin was 6.1±1.23 g/dL. Regarding the indication, the adequacy of transfusions performed in symptomatic individuals was significantly higher compared to asymptomatic individuals (100% vs. 3.9%, p<0.001). Symptomatic individuals received excessive volumes of packed red blood cells less frequently than asymptomatic individuals (17.5% vs. 56.9%, p<0.001). The filtered subtype, indicated for sickle cell anemia, was prescribed in only a quarter of the patients. However, non-indicated subtypes were frequently prescribed. CONCLUSION: This study found low adequacy in the indication and calculation of the transfusion volume of packed red blood cells in asymptomatic individuals. Few patients received filtered red blood cells, resulting in increased risks of transfusion reactions. On the contrary, non-indicated subtypes were prescribed in a quarter of transfusions, which resulted in higher costs and delay in receiving packed red blood cells.

Prescription of red cell concentrates by emergency physicians

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE To evaluate the adequacy of the prescription of red cell concentrates by emergency physicians. METHODS A cross-sectional study based on the survey of transfusion requests records completed by emergency physicians, from May/2018 to April/2019, in an emergency hospital. Adequacy in the indication, volume, and subtype (filtered, irradiated, and washed) of prescribed erythrocytes were evaluated. To compare the qualitative data, we used the χ2 test. The significance level adopted was 5%. RESULTS One thousand and twenty-two transfusions were evaluated. The indication, volume, and subtypes were correct in 72.7%, 45.9%, and 81.6% respectively. Transfusion in symptomatic patients presented superior adequacy when compared to asymptomatic individuals with significant statistical difference (indication: 79,6% vs 67.2%, p <0.001; Volume: 63.5% vs 31.7%, p <0.001; subtype: 85.3% vs 78.7%, p 0.006). Among clinical situations, there were more errors in sepsis (39.7%) and pneumonia (36.3%). More than half of the prescriptions presented excessive volume, raising the risk of circulatory overload, observing that the mean age was 60.6 years. The specific analysis of the prescribed subtypes showed adequacy of 17.9% in the filtered, 1.7% in the irradiated, and none in the washed. Thirty transfusions should have been filtered, but the prescriber did not request the subtype. CONCLUSION One hypothesis for the observed inaccuracies is inadequate medical training on the subject, both in undergraduate and medical residency, associated with a lack of continuing education on transfusion protocols. The transfusion Committee received the results of this study with a proposal for continuing education measures on transfusion hemotherapy.

RESUMO OBJETIVO Avaliar a adequação da prescrição de concentrados de hemácias por médicos emergencistas. MÉTODOS Estudo transversal por levantamento de fichas de requisição de transfusões preenchidas por médicos emergencistas, no período de maio de 2018 a abril de 2019, em um hospital de emergências. Foram avaliadas as adequações na indicação, volume e subtipo (filtradas, irradiadas e lavadas) de hemácias prescritas. Para comparação dos dados qualitativos, utilizamos o teste de χ2. O nível de significância adotado foi de 5%. RESULTADOS Foram avaliadas 1.022 transfusões. A indicação, o volume e os subtipos estavam corretos em 72,7%, 45,9% e 81,6%, respectivamente. A transfusão prescrita em pacientes sintomáticos apresentou adequação superior quando comparada aos assintomáticos, com diferença estatística significativa (indicação: 79,6% vs 67,2% - p<0,001; volume: 63,5% vs 31,7% - p<0,001; subtipo: 85,3% vs 78,7% - p 0,006). Entre as situações clínicas, ocorreram mais erros na sepse (39,7%) e pneumonia (36,3%). Mais da metade das prescrições apresentavam volume excessivo, elevando o risco de sobrecarga circulatória, observando-se que a média da idade foi 60,6 anos. A análise específica dos subtipos prescritos apresentou adequação de 17,9% nas filtradas, 1,7% nas irradiadas e nenhuma das lavadas. Trinta transfusões deveriam ter sido filtradas, porém o prescritor não solicitou o subtipo. CONCLUSÃO Uma hipótese para as incorreções observadas é a formação médica inadequada sobre o assunto, tanto na graduação como na residência médica, associada à falta de atualização nos protocolos transfusionais. O comitê transfusional recebeu os resultados deste estudo com proposta de medidas de educação permanente sobre hemoterapia transfusional.